Category Archives: Uncategorized

Underdogs? What will happen with Cubs this season?

The 2016 champs did not add much in the way of developments within winter, but they are playing disrespected underdog card to perfection as spring training opens.

The Cubs did not appear for their first exercise day of this spring Wednesday using a glistening new free agent starting pitcher with any new big-ticket relievers.

But if you feel the manager is the biggest thing that’s new for the team this spring, he will tell you that the biggest addition is that the processor onto the team’s collective shoulder.

“I believe they have enjoyed individuals type of counting them having a tiny bit of their’what-if’ vibe,” manager David Ross said. “I believe that they’re out to prove something in what I see in their eyes and their opinions.”

Counting out them? The Cubs got bounced from the wild-card game in 2018, subsequently missed the playoffs through an 84-win 2019 season, and also their sole major-league acquisitions because last year were one-year fliers on bounce-back candidates Steven Souza Jr. and Jeremy Jeffress.

No wonder nobody out of Chicago or outside a half-mile radius around Sloan Park in Arizona appears to think these men are legitimate threats to win the National League Central.

“We have a chip on the shoulder,” said left fielder Kyle Schwarber, that strongly objected to this proposal this center of Cubs peaked long ago. “I understand we all expect a whole lot more of us than what’s happened the last couple years. … I do not think that it’s a secret we have got to do things better.

“You look at it on paper, you have got a lot of guys in here that are studs, by the [starting pitching] staff into the place players into the bullpen, the coaching staff, front office, the owners, everything like that.”

If Schwarber believes it is only about refocusing and allowing the talent take over using a new season of renewed function, veteran first baseman Anthony Rizzo cautions against assuming anything.

“I believe we are a certain group. We are also a extremely humbled group at the moment,” said Rizzo who admits this team has a lot to prove after disappointing endings to the last two seasons — that, in large part, price the last manager his job.

“Processor on the shoulder? I really don’t see why we deserve a chip on the shoulder,” Rizzo said. “We did not make the playoffs [last] year. We have got to go out and earn it. I believe that it’s on us to be the best team this year. We have got the talent.”

That’s another motif running throughout the clubhouse, that the whole core returned even though a winter of trade rumors involving several players — a heart that won a World Series in the majority of cases as rookies and second-year players.

“If you look around, our team’s really talented,” said Tyler Chatwood, that may have a major say in how well the team plays this year when he retakes the fifth spot in the rotation as planned and performs nicely. “Nobody liked the last year finished — the last two years, honestly. I believe everybody’s starving and ready to begin and prove everybody wrong.”

David Ross addresses Kris Bryant some of the latest rumors

Chicago Cubs director David Ross dealt with the trade rumors surrounding third baseman Kris Bryant on Thursday while talking with reporters.

Together with the Chicago Cubs Convention this weekend, Cubs’ director David Ross assembled with reporters to go over the group’s upcoming year.

There wasn’t any larger issue for Ross to tackle in relation to the near future of third baseman Kris Bryant. Bryant was at the center of the Cubs’ off-season strategies contemplating the impending ruling on his own grievance within his Major League Baseball agency period and the trade rumors that have followed closely during the winter.

The Cubs have apparently been awaiting 2 shoes to fall about a possible exchange of Bryant. The first being for its next baseman marketplace to come up with and the next being the judgment on if Bryant is under staff control for an additional season or two seasons.

Following free-agent third baseman Josh Donaldson signed with the Minnesota Twins earlier this week, the attention changed to Bryant and Colorado Rockies third baseman Nolan Arenado as equally third basemen could possibly be available via commerce.

Ross, however, doesn’t picture that the Cubs trading Bryant. This was what Ross had to say while talking using a group of colleagues that comprised Jordan Bastian of MLB.com.

“Together with how matters stand right now coming into camp, KB’s on the roster,” Ross stated at. “I expect him to be there. I believe that the fans need to expect him to be there. This can be an exciting time to become a Cubs supervisor. There is a good deal of talent. There is no ceiling for this particular group.”

There was nothing else that Ross might have stated. Kris Bryant is a present member of the Chicago Cubs’ roster. So long as Bryant is about the Cubs’ roster, the anticipation is that the third baseman is going to probably be with the group when they start Spring Training .

On the eve of the conference, Ross isn’t likely to acknowledge that there could be a strong possibility that Bryant doesn’t begin the season with the Cubs. Particularly once you think about that Bryant has been declared to look at this weekend’s festivities.

Ross’ remarks and Bryant’s scheduled appearance, but failed to stop trade rumors from rebuilding on Thursday.

While performing a radio hit by The Waddle and Silvy Show on ESPN 1000 this day, Jesse Rogers of ESPN Chicago reported the Atlanta Braves have re-engaged in Bryant trade talks with the Cubs.

The Braves have consistently made the most sense for the Cubs in the event they chose to exchange Bryant. That opinion holds true particularly today after Donaldson signed with the Twins. Before this Donaldson signing, the Braves had the anticipation of re-signing the veteran third baseman. The Braves have a gap in the third base position and Bryant can create the most sense.

The Braves have various Major League-ready pitchers and position players who would suit the Cubs’ steep asking price for Bryant. Actually, previous reports from this off-season would imply that the Cubs would rather exchange Bryant into Braves. The Cubs allegedly have their attention Ian Anderson, Austin Riley, Drew Waters, and Kyle Wright.

We’ll most likely have a response to Bryant’s future over another month. The next foundation marketplace has developed and also the grievance ruling is expected shortly. Following the judgment is finalized, the Cubs can also finalize a commerce of Bryant into the Braves. Meaning, if Bryant takes the point in the Cubs’ tradition that weekend, it might very well be the final time that he dons a Cubs’ jersey.

MLB Qualifying Deadline 2020

Thursday was the deadline for Major League players to accept or decline the one-year qualifying offer tendered with their own teams. The qualifying supply is a one year contract to get 17.8 million dollars. 10 players had qualifying supplies this offseason.

Accepting the Offer
17.8 million dollars is a good deal of money to flip down to one year’s pay. That means that you can certainly understand why a player would take the offer. However, there are different reasons for accepting. Perhaps the market for that player isn’t in demand. It then becomes a situation in which the player is gambling on himself. That player can take the deal and become a free agent next season once the market could be in greater demand for their services. But that is dependent upon the player having a much better season.

Also, there are cases where that player and the team want a long-term contract. By accepting that the one year provides this provides both parties more hours to agree to a long-term contract.

Making the Offer

A Major League team is likely to make a qualifying offer to a player as a way to protect themselves from potentially losing an asset. It’s quite common for a team to make the offer understanding that the player does want to be a free agent and sign with another team. In this case, the team could be compensated using a draft selection. Any team that does signal a player who declined a qualifying supply will shed at least one draft selection and maybe more.

So tendering a player a qualifying supply is more about the company and guarding your franchise than anything else. There have been cases where the team didn’t want to have the player back but the player accepted the deal. Neil Walker is a player that matches that scenario.

The New York Mets diminished to signal Walker long term as a consequence of his injury history. After the Mets gave Walker the qualifying deal after the 2016 season of 17.2 million dollars it was not anticipated he’d accept it. Walker did accept the deal and was traded halfway throughout the 2017 season.

This procedure has many rules and layers, To see a complete principle and all of its layers you can take a look at MLB.COM.

The Players

Because this procedure was set into place 90 players have been made an MLB qualifying offer. Just eight players have accepted the deal. This year two players accepted. Here’s a look at these 2 players.

Main reasons Kris Bryant is going to stay with Cubs during this season

Many fans consider Chicago Cubs third baseman Kris Bryant is going to probably be gone next season. What are the three best reasons Bryant should stay a Cub?

Despite all of the turmoil of late using Chicago Cubs Kris Bryant and his contract, Chicago enjoys Bryant and does not want him playing in another uniform. A whole lot of Bryant’s fate will be dependent on the results of the grievance hearings, which declared the first week of November from the very first start back on October 21st.

That’s a good deal of talks, and although the Player’s Association thinks they have a fantastic case, the Cubs have a lot of legitimate reasons for holding Bryant back, and this will also make a difference.

If Major League Baseball grants Bryant his one year afterward he’ll become a free agent this off-season and rather an expensive catch to get a team searching to get a budding superstar and probably too pricey for the Cubs to afford. When the Chicago Cubs win the grievance, then there will probably be bad blood between the golf club and player, and in that instance, the club with one year left of possession could trade Bryant for something that they desperately require.

There’s also some goodness for Bryant if he can use all the Cubs management and stay at Chicago. For some reason, everyone is talking about Bryant like he has already gone. So let us take a look at the three greatest reasons Bryant ought to stay in Chicago.

Five players who could be traded Prior to Monday’s non-tender deadline

Monday is a really important day on that the MLB offseason calendar. It’s the day all 30 teams need to choose whether to tender their pre-arbitration and arbitration-eligible players a contract to the 2020 season. They do not have to register them before Monday, but they do at least have to make a contract deal. Players who don’t get an offer are believed to be non-tendered and become free agents.

R.J. Anderson has already looked at eight notable players who might be non-tendered Monday. Now we are going to look at five players who might be traded prior to Monday’s 8 pm ET deadline. These are players who may be deemed overly expensive by their present team, but may nevertheless be thought of as a reasonable investment from another club. The non-tender deadline always brings a couple of trades.

The five players are listed alphabetically and notice that estimated 2020 salaries come from MLB Trade Rumors.

The Chicago Cubs are going downhill this season?

Every thriving entity has a peak. The Romans had the Pax Romana. Napoleon had the Battle of Austerlitz. The Simpsons had the Who Shot Mr. Burns? cliffhanger. For the early 21st-century Cubs, it was Michael Martinez grounding out on a gentle November day, giving the team its first World Series championship since 1908. Moistened by celebratory alcohol, this was almost certainly the peak for all these Cubs, and also a second championship probably would not touch the magic of the moment.

Since 2016, the Cubs completed each season a little less efficiently than the prior one. The 2017 team dropped four to the Dodgers in the NLCS, and the 2018 team’s finish came in a wild card game against the Colorado Rockies. The 2019 team did not even make it into October.

The club dynasty was constructed on growing players from inside and utilizing their big-market financial heft to play free agency. Both of these ingredients have faded into the background in recent years as the team’s farm system has been weakened from trades and graduations while ownership has increasingly embraced a more frugal financial strategy. The Cubs are a team in decline, to the point at which they are any old NL Central competition, not a behemoth pushing around the Cardinals or Brewers or Reds.

The silver lining is that decrease can take a little while. As my colleague Craig Edwards mentioned in a recent bit, the Cubs still have a very powerful core, despite their uninspiring 84-78 record. The decrease is not necessarily collapsed. The Roman Empire limped on for 300 years after Marcus Aurelius, and the Byzantine offshoot lasted more than a century. It required a decade after the Treaty of Tilsit to eliminate Napoleon for great. The Simpsons had memorable episodes for a very long time after its peak, and presumably, someone remains watching the series, currently in its 31st season.

The existing Cubs are not done, but you can see the finish on the horizon.

The Installation

Can there be such a thing as a humiliating 95-win season? When there is, the 2018 Cubs may have been the best example of this. After spending the first few months poking around the .500 mark, the Cubs jumped to reclaim first place in July. In early September, the team started a five-game lead to the NL Central and had pulled to within a game of the Dodgers for the best record in the National League. Then they collapsed without actually collapsing, blowing off the divisional lead even though a respectable 16-12 September record. The Brewers went 19-7 that month, linking the Cubs for first place on the last day of this season. After two weeks of company control, it required the Cubs only one game to eliminate the branch and then another reduction to finish their season.

Faced with a branch they could not dominate, the Cubs had a quiet offseason that year. Just two players making more than a thousand dollars were signed in the winter in Daniel Descalso and Brad Brach. After ranking 10th in the majors in positional WAR and 14th in hurling WAR in 2018, the team spent the offseason just tinkering slightly around the edges. After the Cardinals acquired Paul Goldschmidt, the Cubs’ answer was to cheerfully announce that they had been from money.

The Cubs didn’t make up for the lack of investment by making trades. Rowan Wick, acquired from the Padres in a silent November deal, turned out to be a wonderful addition, however, Rowan Wick was not likely to ascertain the fate of this 2019 Cubs.

Chicago Cubs: Trading Jason Heyward is Much More trouble than it is worth

The Chicago Cubs are very likely to encounter payroll problems again this offseason unless they can make some moves to offload contracts, but can be trading someone just like Jason Heyward more trouble than it is worth?

It has long been a frequent stage of speculation to get Chicago Cubs fans to ascertain a suitable trade for Jason Heyward. Heyward, regardless of his memorable rain delay address, has yet to live up to this massive contract awarded to him from the team in 2016.

The issue with trading someone similar to Heyward, however, comes in finding a creative way to maneuver an albatross contract. Farhan Zaidi of those Giants managed to do this using Mark Melancon’s contract throughout the 2019 trade deadline, but would the Cubs transfer Heyward in a way that’s actually worthwhile?

Chicago Cubs: Which first time manager will have the most success?
Cubs 2020 bullpen may be much better and cheaper than previously
What’s next for your Cubs Albert Almora is 2020?
Is potential Cubs Jonathan Villar an option for next base?
Chicago Cubs: Carl Edwards Jr. seems to get back on track in Seattle

Heyward is at the last four years of an eight-year, $184 million contract, meaning whatever team that could take him would also take to a significant increase in salary. While Heyward has been a superb guardian inappropriate, winning two Gold Gloves so far as a Cub, his offensive production has been under league average each year that he has been with the team.

The main reason why the Giants were able to maneuver Melancon is that they found another team needing a good reliever and capitalized on the chance. For Heyward, who, at best, plays as an above-average defensive replacement, will not exactly have a lot of takers even when demand is large.

He clearly lacks a major upside for a lot of teams, meaning he would probably have to be paired with another bit so as to be transferred. Writer Joel Sherman suggested a trade on MLB Network’s Hot Stove that, although ridiculous, reflects the idea that the Cubs can’t transfer Heyward on his own for a fantastic yield.

The issue with this is that it may be a deal-breaker for additional competing teams potentially considering additional trade chips such as Kris Bryant and Willson Contreras. A team like the Dodgers that may be considering Bryant certainly would not want to also take on Heyward’s massive contract.

If anything, the team would probably seem more to ditch his salary, but locating a match there is not so straightforward either. It might entail little to no yield (or eating a number of the contract) and probably require another bit as well, therefore the Cubs would have to locate a suitable replacement someplace else or via another trade. There is also a certain leadership component that Heyward supplies that would be missing from his absence.

Dumping Heyward would provide the team a reason to really go after dear short-time Cub Nicholas Castellanos, but the drop-off in defense will certainly be noticeable. Despite re-signing Castellanos, moving Heyward puts pressure on the team to drive hard in free agency, something not easy to guarantee together with the number of teams searching for luxury upgrades.

Cubs 2020 bullpen Maybe Much Better and cheaper than Previously

In the event that you discovered yourself lamenting the performance and price of this Chicago Cubs 2019 bullpen, then there might be relief on the two counts directly around the corner.
The Chicago Cubs bullpens are unpredictable creatures that bear no resemblance to the mundane nature of constant major league ballplayers who follow patterns and have similar stats year-in and year-out. One year, you catch lightning in a jar with a rare vintage of Brian Duensing, circa 2017. Next, you can’t get rid of that bitter and fair Riesling… er, Duensing fast enough.

That having been said, it is hard to come to grips with just how bad a number of the usually stellar Cubs replacements were at times in 2019. A Few of the men, such as Pedro Strop and Steve Cishek, had pitched fabulously for the Cubs and Joe Maddon for years. Others had shown promise at times in large situations for the Cubs, such as Carl Edwards Jr. And Mike Montgomery, but had struggled to find consistency from the pencil. Others, such as handsomely paid nearer Craig Kimbrel, were anticipated to be quite great and laid an egg at the initial go-round from the Friendly Confines.

Though the 2019 iteration of this Chicago Cubs bullpen came up a bit short concerning expectations and performance, a few indications might be pointing to a far greater and a far cheaper relief unit following season. Between trades, saying goodbye to expensive vets who were good for the Cubs, and jettisoning oft-injured men, the Cubs could well encounter a considerable upswing in performance from their pencil at a far cheaper price than last season.

Cubs Nearing Decision Time To Get Addison Russell

The deadline for teams to tender contracts for arbitration-eligible players will be on Monday, December 2 at 8 pm ET, and the Chicago Cubs have seven that qualify. They will have important choices to make with the likes of Kris Bryant, Javy Baez, and Willson Contreras, but one name on that record is a possible candidate to become non-tendered: Addison Russell.

MLB Trade Rumors estimates that Russell is going to be expected for something in the area of $5 million in 2020. That’s close to double what he earned this year, and also for a team seeking to trim payroll, non-tendering Russell is an easy way to work toward acquiring a slightly leaner budget.

Away from the field, Russell was the topic of serious domestic violence allegations, the majority of that came to light from 2018. Those were sufficient for him to function a 40-game suspension that began at the conclusion of their 2018 season and ran before early May 2019.

Even though the Cubs front office voiced want a year ago to help Russell by becoming a part of the solution, there are a couple reasons why the song in Chicago this year will probably differ.

First, there is the aforementioned price. The Cubs are proposed by Roster Resource to be about $10 million under the luxury tax threshold in 2020, however they have many players eligible for arbitration and roll up holes to be addressed. An added price of almost $2.5 million for Russell is one that they do not require.

And whatever the cost for Russell could be, he still has not proven that he respects it. In 2019, Russell was worth half a win above replacement, and he has been in steady decline since 2.6 and 3.3 fWAR seasons his first couple of years at the majors in 2015 and 2016. He was essentially relegated into platooning and coming in as a defensive replacement at this season.

Along with that, there were instances when Russell made serious mistakes about the area, for example after in July when he admitted that he didn’t understand the team’s indications . His play at the plateon the area, and also on the basepaths — is increasingly bad.

Between these issues and also the off-the-field troubles, Russell has not made a particularly strong case for the Cubs to maintain him. At this time, he provides some depth at second base and shortstop, however involving Baez, David Bote, a potential yield from Ben Zobrist, and the development of Nico Hoerner, the necessity to maintain Russell from the depth chart isn’t there.

There have also been rumors that the Cubs could be in play to trade with the Royals for second baseman Whit Merrifield, according to MLB.com’s Jon Morosi.

In case a trade similar to that comes to fruition, it might leave Russell’s presence on the roster even more superfluous. Merrifield has been steadily great for the Royals to the past 3 seasons, and also his 81.7 percent contact rate in 2019 will offer a boost at the plate that the Cubs badly desire. They ranked 22nd in the league at contact rate last year (73.3).

Russell was a centerpiece of this July 2014 trade together with the Athletics that famously comprised Oakland vice president Billy Beane telling Cubs president of operations Theo Epstein that he had simply traded him Barry Larkin.

That has not demonstrated to be the case, but Russell is only 25, so the potential remains. However, at this stage, it appears unlikely that he reaches that sort of potential — or anything near it in Chicago.

Cubs vs Brewers

The Chicago Cubs and Milwaukee Brewers are just two of their most fun teams to watch at Major League Baseball, and it’s almost always a fantastic match when the two match up. Fantastic pitching, a few of the very fascinating sluggers in the game, along with an energetic audience: all these are only a couple items which make it so amazing if the Cubs and Brewers go toe to toe. You may anticipate a wonderful time in the park through Cubs vs. Brewers games.

Cubs vs Brewers Matchup

Fans interested in grabbing a Cubs vs. Brewers game possess a fantastic alternative irrespective of where the sport is happening, as both teams compete at a really top-notch place. The Cubs play home games at Wrigley Field at Chicago, while the Brewers call Miller Park at Milwaukee house.

Cubs vs Brewers Tickets Information

When the Cubs and Brewers have some matches scheduled, they are sometimes observed on peak of the webpage. Welcome into a Cubs home game generally price $110, but that changes from game to game and might not be the situation once the Brewers come to city. Tickets to find the Brewers at house market for a mean of $39, and more, that can be subject to change dependent on the matchup, day of week, as well as the weather.

To observe Chicago Cubs tickets, fans can navigate the Cubs tickets page. To observe Milwaukee Brewers tickets, fans can navigate the Brewers tickets page. Should you decide a sport isn’t for you but are searching for strategies this weekend, then SeatGeek has your ticket into a plethora of occasions in Chicago this weekend. If you’re only searching for something to do from the Milwaukee area, you can see all occasions in Milwaukee this weekend.

Begin your investigation by analyzing the 2019 Milwaukee Brewers program and deciding upon the sport you’d love to attend. It is possible to use our useful filters around the left side of this display for help as required. Whenever you choose a matchup, click on”Tickets” alongside the match you have selected.

Utilize tools such as the cost range bar to locate cheap Brewers tickets, although the amount filter can allow you to narrow down the alternatives to show listings together with the amount of seats you want. You are also able to click right on the interactive Miller Park seating chart.

Once you have chosen your Brewer tickets, then hit”Purchase” From that point, simply sign into Vivid Chairs and finish the checkout info. Our 100% Buyer Guarantee ensures your Brewers tickets are accurate and will arrive punctually.